Thursday, August 21, 2014

• August 21, 2014: LGBTQ Campus Liaison


Senate meeting, 8/21/14

     Lots of non-Senate visitors today, including IVC Prez Glenn R, Police Chief Will Glen, Shack, David G, Cathleen G, Linda Fontanilla, et al.

Public comments:
     Tracy F informed us that her Friday morning hike event now gets flex credit.
     VP Linda F yammered about the availability of new money, something about the Student Success Act. We’ve got to decide how to use these funds, and we’re thinking of hiring 4 full-time counselors, more matriculation staff, etc. Waiting for first draft of IVC budget.

     IVC Prez Glenn Roquemore spoke to the group. He wants to help “with the flow of communication,” he says. Wants to answer any questions we might have.
     Naturally, nobody had any questions for him. He, or his suit, sat down.

     Police Chief Will Glen addressed anxieties and problems concerning parking stickers. He’s trying to set up some kind of online thingy. Right now, stickers are available, but, if they run out, his office will go with some kind of grace period.
     He says the college anticipated increased enrollments by creating new parking spaces, etc. in the grass, so parking has gone well thus far. (I spoke privately with Will recently and he seemed anxious to explain why he does what he does. He noted that, down at Saddleback, they tow parking offenders, but he and his dept. really try to avoid that here.)

Exec reports:

Ac. Sen. Prez Kathy Schmeidler:
     The Senate Cabinet was busy over the summer, attending lots of meetings. Looks like we’re finally moving forward with ATEP, our troubled Tustin facility. (There was a fair amount of blathering about ATEP during this meeting.) Kathy announced that there’s been an increase in reassigned time for the Curriculum Chair (Diana H) [up to 9] and Vice President (Bob U) [up to 6]. That’s good, but I asked if there’s any movement with regard to increasing reassigned time for faculty chairs. Um, that’s a Faculty Union issue, said Kathy.
     As we move forward with ATEP, we’ll need volunteers to serve on the various committees. Same for the new round of Accreditation (yep, that’s gearing up). HR presented training for (faculty) EE0’s reps on hiring committees during flex week, but few attended. If you are interested, let us know. Scholarship committee is looking for members. Any interest? We need to show interest or this “opportunity” will be lost. (Good grief. How long have we been at this? I don’t think they want this thing fixed.)

VP Bob Urell:
     Bob attended the budget committee meeting yesterday. Davit’s presentation is available


Do take a look. There’s new info on resource requests (an old sore subject).

Ac Affairs dude Brent McKim (Design Model Making Instructor):
     He’s looking for suggestions, volunteers for our speaker series (DALS and IVC2IVC).

Curriculum maven Diana Hurlbut:
     Her committee’s stuff is now available at insideIVC (at the college website). The course revision schedule is available on Curricunit (which she calls C-net). October 1 is deadline for new courses, November 1 for programs. I think her committee meets every Tuesday at 2. Look at old May email for deadlines for course revision. These days, the state is being very picky, and all of our work experience courses got kicked back. Blah blah blah.

Item 7: Board Policies and Administrative Regulations:
     Looks like we’re not ready to take action on any of this. The review committee met in June and has not met since. Please look at the BP concerning student rights (5530):

Roy's pal, Teddy
(This is at InsideIVC.) Some issues here.
     Uh-oh, looks like Ray Chandos has volunteered for the BPAR (BP review) committee. (That can’t be good.)  That’ll be up for a vote next time. Any interest in serving on that committee? It’s pretty important. (Ray used to serve as Raghu Mathur’s mole, providing reports on faculty conduct after every senate meeting.)

Item 8: Grade Grievance and Student Discipline Panel Pool
     We’re looking for volunteers. Any interest?

Item 10: security and safety
     “Academic Affairs Committee is engaged in conversation with the Safety Committee concerning campus safety and security policies and procedures.” Kathy had nothing for us; hopes to have updates soon.

Item 11: Faculty Advisor Handbook (For Student Clubs)
     There’s been a fair amount of carping about the old handbook. Somebody’s working on it; no updates.

Item 12: Training to be an Equal Employment Opportunity Rep on Hiring Committees
     “Very few faculty members attended the Professional Development Week training session. Is there interest in providing this training to faculty members?” Use it or lose it.

Item 13: 2015-2016 Academic Calendar
     There seems to be some faculty interest in a winter intersession (January), which would not offer ordinary classes but classes that can be presented in a brief period (e.g., field trips, counseling, different timing modules, extended studies, etc.). WHAT DO YOU THINK? (No, I’m really asking, and so is Kathy.) What’s the sense of the faculty?
     At last board meeting, the calendar went to a vote, but one board member, who had been approached by “some faculty,” had concerns about the calendar, owing to the January break. (Trustee James Wright, as I recall.) But the calendar had already been approved by all groups, including the senates (thus the faculty). Clearly, once again, the Saddleback nurses aren’t happy and they’re pounding their little fists on the floor. In any case, we need to know: do faculty wish to pursue this calendar? We need faculty input. (So tell Brittany or me what you think.)
     Getting back to the calendar issue: do our faculty even care about this calendar issue (the intersession, etc.)? Let us know what you think.
     I reminded everyone of the old issue of “separate calendars” (i.e., the two colleges going their own way). Kathy reminded us that the Chancellor and IT are dead set against that. But many other groups favor the change.

Item 14: CTE Coordinator
     June McLaughlin - approved

Item 15: IVC Faculty Involvement in Contract Education, Community Education, and Continuing Education
     “Senators requested that information be provided as to the process of determining faculty involvement in Contract Education, Community Education and Continuing Education.” Our new dean will come and present about this.
     We faculty want a voice regarding this kind of instruction, since it all flies under the IVC banner. (There’ve been disturbing problems in the past. See here.)

Item 16: Host ASCCC [State Ac. Senate] Executive Committee Meeting 11/12
     “ASCCC asked [us] to host their November 12th meeting at IVC.” Glenn’s onboard with this. Are we? (We briefly discussed the recent turmoil at the State Ac. Senate, much of it concerning the Pres of that body. (There were transparency concerns and, in general, concerns about how the state senate was run.) She’s now out and things will likely return to normal. Taking these meetings on the road is part of the “healing process.” So, yes, we are on board with this. (We voted in favor.)

Item 17: Senate-Organized Orientation for New and Interested Faculty Members
     “New Full-time faculty receive an ongoing orientation through the Office of Instruction. It was suggested that the Academic Senate offer an additional orientation for new and interested faculty members.” –Do we favor this? Seems like a good idea and Craig is amenable. Yes.

Item 18: LGBTQ Campus Liaison
     The Ed Code requests (?) each district “designate an employee at each [campus] as a point of contact for the needs of [LGBT] faculty, staff, and students….”
     For now, VP Linda F does this job, though she’s not a designated liaison, etc. She’ll be holding a meeting (Aug 26) to pursue this matter.
     We discussed the situation; it seemed to several of us that we should indeed go forward, identifying this liaison, etc. In the end, a motion was passed according to which the Senate supports considering the creation of this designated person. That’s good; it’ll go forward.
     Some of us wanted a stronger motion, but that might have inspired opposition. (At least one senator—he hails from the Mathurian end of campus—voted against pursuit of this, and our own Ac. Sen. VP seemed to have a problem with it.) Please attend Linda F’s meeting (on the 26th, at 2 p.m.) if you have any interest in any of this. Brooke Choo seemed to be the point person (very much in favor of the campus liaison idea); send her word if you want her to represent you.
     So, in the end, the Senate moved to support the consideration of this position through a formal work group. Academic Affairs will head this up.
     There was a bizarre discussion of ways to keep input about this “anonymous.” What was that all about? Anyway, anyone who wishes his or her input to be anonymous will be accommodated. (Contact Brooke. Identify yourself as “Deep Throat.”)

     Also, we’re looking for a faculty advisor for the LGBTQ student club. (Years ago, I was the faculty advisor to GLAS, but the group seemed to melt away after a few weeks.) (And, no, I’m not gay [etc.], not that there’s anything wrong with that.)

     Part Time Faculty Reps on Senate: please let us know if you would like to be put forward for this! (These notes are sent to the full Hum faculty.)

Senator Roy Bauer

Your senators:

Roy Bauer – rbauer@ivc.edu
Brittany Adams – badams26@ivc.edu


—But, again, there’s the availability of a part-time faculty rep!


My sister's cat, TigerAnn, says "hey"

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

• August 13, 2014: "additional bathroom options'


Senate meeting (i.e., meeting of Rep Council of Ac. Senate), Wednesday, August 13, 2014 (Flex week), 10:00 a.m.

[Evident] Theme: “Wonderful, wonderful”

     Sen. Prez Kathy Schmeidler welcomes “new people.” There’s a pamphlet introducing everybody, she says. She holds it up. Fancy, glossy.
     She has new faculty members stand and introduce themselves. Karima highlights that this is the first time we’ve had a full-time Sign Language instructor ( Keith G).
     Administrators (who are attending) and other non-faculty introduce themselves (Glenn, Craig, and Linda included).
     She introduces the cabinet, including Brett McKim and Brooke Choo, newbies on the cab.

     asenate@ivc.edu --that’s our email address

Public comments:

     Ann Akers comes up to present—something. She’s doing high school outreach as usual. She asks for faculty volunteers, etc. Nobody makes a move.

     Pres. Glenn Roquemore: was very busy during the summer. Held a number of retreats concerning strategic planning, something we’re working to make better. (Good luck; nobody understands it.) We had a “wonderful opening” this year. Monday’s speaker was great (a gal on an important national commission/report re community colleges). Then the Chancellor’s Opening session; State Chancellor Brice Harris emphasized some of the same issues/themes. “Wonderful, wonderful,” said Glenn or his suit.
     We’re building buildings, 2 in particular. A400 (which will house Humanities). And, next to A400, we’ll be building the Solar Decathlon House (?). “Very exciting” (though Glenn exhibited no excitement).
     Bad news re state-wide bonds. It had seemed that the Governor was letting those go forward; but now it appears that we won’t be getting that money. Water bond instead. (Drought, you know.) Sad news, hope it turns around. Doesn’t look good.
     We’ll be busy with Accreditation (really? Haven’t we been workin’ on it for freakin’ years?). “We’ll be on the offensive,” not defensive, said Glenn.
     Steve R asks a question about the loss of parking spaces, owing to construction. Boils down to 18 spots, says Glenn (re the second building).
     Priscilla asks whether the new building will be LEED(?) certified (i.e., all green and shit). That’s the goal, he says.
     Glenn gets applause for no reason at all. I stare at people’s hands.

Other public comments?

     VP of SS, Linda Fontanilla, gets up and yammers like she does. Several community colleges are seeing a decline in enrollments, including Saddleback (not IVC). And so this “encroaches” into other cc areas. (I think she means that other college districts are poaching.) We have to be protective of our own service area. Big one-day event: looking for 50 volunteers to join us going to businesses—with a tin of cookies and brochures. To remind them: we are your premier cc in your service area. (Not those other guys, those rat bastards.)
     Yeah, cookies. That’ll do it.
     The goal: reaching out to 500 local businesses in one day with this all-important message. There’ll be a debriefing session. Hot fun. And a Bouncy House. It’ll be great for the college. (Newbies: get used to it. Lots of dog and pony shows, little substance. That’s what LF is all about.)
     Traci F asks if we can get info identifying the “service areas.” Diana H carps that this event is scheduled on a Wednesday, when most of us are teaching. Linda’s got nothing. She yammers anew. Something about student success, student equity. Concepts, buzz words—that’s the ticket. Just keep pronouncing them, like a mantra.

     Ilknur (EW) announces something for science and engineering students. A transfer event, I guess. “It’s gonna be really fun.”


     Ted Weatherford (of dance/PE) mentions the Veterans Center. Please get involved. BSTIC 118. As you know, the Vet Center has been troubled of late.

     Virginia asks about “additional bathroom options” in the A Quad area, which is affected, obviously, by the construction and a general dislike for woman from on high. Not much stall presence right now (my phrase). VPI Craig J responds. We can get together with John (Edwards) and discuss this. Kathy and Glenn discuss temp restroom trailers that are “not unpleasant.”

     Steve R carps yet again about the lack of TP and the unpleasant conditions in restrooms. Can we at long last deal with this? Merd! Kathy offers assurances or reassurances or rereassurances. Steve doubles down on his carpage, but to no avail.

     Traci Fahimi: we’ll continue with our Friday morning hike tradition. You can get flex credit! (Someone groans.) We try to keep hike locations 20 minutes or fewer from IVC.

     Bill Etter was initially scheduled to do a presentation based on his sabbatical. It’s been rescheduled. Teaching Writing across the Disciplines. Important.

Kathy speechifies:

     Kathy says the purpose of the Ac. Senate is to be a forum for the faculty. We hold as much control as is feasible over academic matters: curricula, programs, etc. So we even have a role in budget, facilities—every aspect of running the institution, really. Through the senate, faculty can be enlisted in many enterprises and activities. (Then there’s the Faculty Association, which concerns contractual issues.) The senate is the body that oversees our professional role as faculty. The senate and the FA enjoy a very collegial relationship, of course (a situation embodied by Kathy, who is also a union officer.
     I (Roy) raise some peevish points about ATEP [the district’s third “campus” out in   Tustin]—and our alleged leadership in developing programs and curricula there. (At yesterday’s Chancellor’s Opening Session, I note, Glenn asserted that faculty are very involved in developing programs and courses out there; false .) We seem not to be in the loop. I complained once again about the Early College Program and the general obscurity and blobulosity of the process concerning strategic planning. So Byzantine, etc.

     Kathy agrees with all that. Once again, she assures us that we’re being vigilant about ATEP development, now that, at long last, we got the piece of legal paper (from the City of Tustin) allowing us to go forward, etc. (Last year, administration held an ATEP organizational meeting and actually failed to invite faculty.)
     Steve mentions that there is a certain amount of faculty ignorance about 10+1 (the areas of responsibility, etc., for faculty, by statute). Kathy answers: the faculty have a role in the decision-making process with regard to all things educational. Participatory governance, it’s called these days (used to be “shared governance”). So we have a primary role in curriculum, etc. Also, an important role in program development, etc. We briefly discussed orientation for new faculty—the importance of explaining the 10+1 areas to them. Get ‘em up to speed.
     We now have four faculty members on the key campus committee (said Kathy, somewhat defensively). We’re represented all over the place, on important committees, in important roles. Many committees are (otherwise) utterly dominated by administrators, and the presence of faculty in the room makes a big difference. At that level, we seem to have a voice, though the proof is in results of course. I think (says Kathy) that we’re making a difference in the long run. Kathy mentions the ATEP organizational episode. We complained and fixed that. See?
     One senator ( Jack?) offered an impressive overview of difficulties with regard to faculty participation and community on campus. Hierarchical, top-down structure of governance. People are simply deciding without soliciting input. Many faculty are ignorant of the “stories” of other faculty members. Wants the senate to lead the kind of “social integration” that would be healthy. What we have now just is not enough.
     At long last, Stephanie flashes the “infamous” 10+1” list: Curriculum, degree requirements, grading policies, programs, faculty roles in accred, program review, processes for institutional planning and budget development, etc. We’re the go to entity for all that. (On paper, if not in reality.)
     Ilknur intrudes with enthusiasm for learning people’s names and leaving apples on desks.
     Another instructor urges making connections with other faculty. He sounds utterly sans clue, albeit enthusiastic.
     Ted W: new faculty, you are stake holders. You’ve got to do more than teach your classes; you’ve got to get involved. This is a wonderful college. But there are some here who have fought important battles in the past. (That’s what it takes.) It’s your school: participate.
     Kathy concurs: You’ve got to invest in the institution.

     Kathy: go to IVC homepage, then “inside IVC.” Under committees, there’s a page for the Academic Senate. Check it out.

     Re the committees and committee structure: go to Ac. Senate site. See committee grid posted there. Faculty Service Assignment pdf has grid with all committees.  You'll be dazzled.


     Dale C speaks. He says something, I know not what (surely it does not matter; long ago, chemicals harshed his circuits and now he can barely function, though, natch, that goes  unnoticed in his school). Kathy yammers about openness to visitors on most, even all, committees. Don’t have to be a member.

     There’s tremendous flexibility, said Steve, regarding what counts as committee work and flex obligation. Check it out. Hell, you can get credit for whistling in a corner.

     June M came up to discuss Career Technical blah blah blah. OK, it’s hard for me to stay tuned here. Also “cooperative work experience,” which is internships, essentially.

     I feel time ticking by. I feel the life force leaving my body. Desperation. Help. These people just won’t stop talking. There’s a YouTube video about “how to be professional,” says June, and she isn’t kidding. Now Ilknur’s speaking and I’m about ready to book or die.

     Roopa Mathur comes up to present on “distance education,” which she co-coordinates. Blah blah blah. 

     Brenda B: SSAMMO
     She passes off to Arleen. She’s talking about the “student success initiative,” and changes to help with that noble effort. Rob’t Melendez stands by her as she yammers. Sounds good, I guess. FERPA (the fed privacy law) is mentioned. New rules. Incoming freshman got priority in registration, so your classes might reflect that. Craig J interjects something, but I didn’t listen. Arleen notes that we have to “write” a student success blah blah blah PLAN. But of course. No doubt they’ll form a committee.
     We’ve acquired state money, pumped up counseling services to increase “success.” Melendez: what changed in counseling? Well, I’m glad you asked. More counseling hours. More in person, face to face, advisement (as opposed to online). Probation and dismissal workshops—that’s going great guns, fully supported. I pump M for info about the need for all these P & D workshops. Are students running amok out there? Melendez explains that’s it’s just academic probation. We think on that. It turns out, there’s a high no-show rate for these workshops. No shit?

     Diana H (courses maven) rolls up and explains meeting times for curriculum, tech review, hot dog sales, etc. If you serve on one of the tech review committees, you get double credit re committee assignment (since they meet every week).

      Brett (the new guy): he says something about new prof develop’t something. Blah blah.

      [VP of Ac Sen] Bob U mentions committees he serves on, representing faculty. Lots of ‘em, and they’re important. Mentions resource requests.

      That’s about it.

     For those interested in an account of yesterday’s Chancellor’s Opening Session (and A400 groundbreaking ceremony), go here:


      -- Your senator  (for now, anyway),


      --Roy