Diana
H carped heartily about lack of progress with regard to campus safety. We were told that
we’d hear back from Chief Glenn, but not yet, etc. Carp, carp, carp.
Kathy
provided an update re the issue with regard to the touted nifty floor device to
lock doors from the inside (it appears to fail to meet state standards).
Moving to item 15, new business
Tier 3 faculty position -
Engineering Technology Full-Time Faculty Position
Overwhelmingly
approved
Reports:
VP Bob Urell:
Deb
Fitz is putting together a presentation on DRAC [District Resource Allocation]
and how it works, how it developed. Obviously, the decisions/actions of DRAC are consequential. We recommend that you attend the presentation. (There is
a link to a PowerPoint presentation.) Fitz wasn’t around when the DRAC process
was developed, so this should be interesting. I'm told that our own Mark McNeil will be on hand to thwart unseemly revisionism.
The budget
will be a big topic for the next few months. We hope to get a presentation from
Davit (see flyer below). We are facing a deficit. Still looking at the data about that. Have put forward
large amount for advertising the Summer program. Pushing forward with more substantial weekend
college. We’re planning a huge summer just to meet our target. We’ve had huge
increases in costs here and there and our budget is negatively impacted. An
unhappy trend.
Resource requests: some have
been approved, building and labs. Will be giving an update in two weeks (at
senate).
Kathy:
refers to Fitzsimmons’ DRAC presentation. Lots of rumors flying about possible changes in allocation. Lots of
carping coming from Saddleback faculty in particular. If you’ve heard rumors,
can ask about them at the presentation.
Kathy
goes through schedule of future meetings. Will have three meetings in a row
without… ? We’ll schedule unofficial socializing meetings, sans minutes. We
never seem to have these occasions in which faculty can meet anymore. Spread
the word.
Brett M (of
Ac Affairs): cabinet members were told to go back to their schools for feedback
re senate bylaws. Any ideas? Possible innovations. How we elect officers,
succession, etc.
Diana H (of
Curriculum): Amy and Roopa created a form for distance ed courses. It’s now
formalized. Instructions for what must be done for C-NET. That’s the only news
I’ve got, said Diana.
There’s a huge amount of curriculum
on the CC agenda.
Kathy: we’ve
been doing “crisis” work mostly on curriculum. We’re trying to find ways to eliminate all the
perennial crises. Any suggestions? Discussions underway to make the system work
better.
Roopa:
praises those who have been working on curriculum. Warm and fuzzies. Lukewarm (and fuzzy) applause.
Tiffany: she
said something, I know not what. Something about program review. See what your
program looks like on Curricunet. Any discrepancies? Diana: any changes: you’d
better get cracking. She said lots of things about “verbiage” (pronounced ver-bidge). I think she was ill; looked
like death warmed over. Plus that pronunciation of “verbiage.” I nearly carped.
Kathy
insisted on saying more. I tuned her out.
Roopa: more
“verbiage.” Craig J chimed in to agree. Whatever. They hope to have the catalog
ready for fall registration, he said. Unfortunately, we’ve not been able to
meet that deadline in prior years. Aiming for it this time (mid-May). We voted on something and it was unanimous,
whatever it was.
Item 6: board policies,
etc.
Kathy
missed the last meeting (on AR and BP review). Lots of IVC folks were compelled to miss owing to some big to-do.
AR4110a
– this concerns changes in Workday. Commencement attendance is now required,
owing to new contract. (Can take a half day personal leave instead.)
At IVC, they give faculty a
free set of regalia, once. Not a second time. Cap and gown and hood. Rabbit's foot, too.
Nepotism
policy: changed very little. Term “nepotism” again referred to.
Abusive conduct in the
workplace (4720). Please read this carefully. No action taken yet. I drew
attention to the document’s “reasonable person” standard re what is abusive
conduct. Who decides what is reasonable?
So be sure to come back with any feedback. Check it out:
So be sure to come back with any feedback. Check it out:
4720:
ABUSIVE
CONDUCT IN THE WORKPLACE
The South
Orange Community College District is committed to a workplace environment that
is free from abusive conduct. The safety and security of district employees,
students, and visors, is the highest priority to the District and is essential
to carrying out the mission of the District. All reports of abusive behavior
will be taken seriously by members of the district community.
Abusive
conduct is defined as conduct of an employer or employee in the workplace with
malice that a reasonable person would find hostile, offensive, and unrelated to
an employee’s legitimate District business. Abusive conduct may include
repeated infliction of verbal abuse, such as the use of derogatory remarks,
insults, epithets, and verbal
A single act
shall not constitute abusive conduct, unless especially
severe and
egregious.
The District
seeks to foster an environment in which all employees feel free to report
abusive conduct without fear of retaliation or reprisal. Any individual who
experiences or witnesses abusive behavior violating this policy or who has
reason to suspect that these acts or behaviors are occurring should immediately
notify the Office of Human Resources.
Any District
employee who violates this policy will be subject to immediate and appropriate
disciplinary action pursuant to the applicable policies and procedures of the
District, and may further be subject to such additional civil and criminal sanctions
as permitted by law.
The District
shall provide training to all employees on appropriate workplace conduct.
Training is to include recognition of abusive conduct and how to report such
behavior in the workplace.
4306 – calendar issue.
Recently discovered that we’ve failed to observe Cesar Chavez legal holiday
since 1996(?). Very embarrassing. We're scofflaws, we are. Will begin doing so. Buy grapes. (Of course, IVC is the college that steadfastly refuses to invite The Mexican as commencement speaker.)
Item 9 - AANAPISI Grant - Project
Eddy T will come and give us
an update. Lots of activity here. Lots of interest.
Item 12: Revisions to the IVC
Planning and Decision Making Manual
Now
done. Unanimous approval.
IVC is one
of 30 colleges nation-wide to participate in this program. Interested faculty
members will be needed to discuss how we will respond to this initiative, and
to participate in upcoming events.
Kathy described last
meeting/conference. Fabulous, she said. “Very, very interesting.” Typical
students faced with difficult choices with regard to programs/majors, etc.
Daunting. We should rethink clusters. Make it easier for these benighted
pre-college kids. Students need more mentoring, help. Next meeting is April
14-16. We’ll talk about this more later.
Brittany is presently at
meeting regarding this project in beauteous Bakersfield. (Karima also.)
Item 14 - WorkDay – Student
Development Project: BPA [business process analysis] Participation Blah, blah, blah. We work on these things with pricey consultants. BPAs are important, often interesting.
Melanie:
we’ve heard that there are lots of problems with Workday.
Kathy: turns
out it [the student part] is a new program with lots of bugs. Not at all as
advertised before we adopted it. There are two parts of our Workday purchase:
financial (a fiasco; new, not established; a surprise, a mess) and the student system
part (still waiting to see; we are guinea pigs for this, and we knew this).
Hoping that, ultimately, the system would inform students what their record
indicates that they are close to achieving, etc.
Item 17 - Name change – from
Reading Department to The Department of Academic Literacy Bakersfield, city of lights, city of magic |
Melanie
presents: She describes new system, procedures. First change: the name. Very
common now to adopt “Academic Literacy.” Why? That’s what we try to do. Reading
can seem to be about the mechanic act of reading (irrespective of
comprehension), not comprehension and analysis and the like. “Academic
Literacy” makes clear we’re focusing on such aspects of reading as
comprehension.
2nd
change (not on agenda): creating a pathway to basic skills. Looking to create
reading competency requirement for IVC students. In assessment, placed in
“academic literacy” (reading) (they’re offered a recommendation). Moving toward
more common approach. Motion made. Discussion.
What’s-his-name
suggested that we change the name to “Academic literacy and reading,” but that
got lost in the shuffle somehow. The motion passed 23-0-0
Last
group of things:
Why
are we bringing up this election stuff so early? We’ve tended to wait too long
in the past. Causes problems for reassigned time, etc. I made motion: let’s put
together a committee. The usual suspects (Rich and Joon) were mentioned to
serve on that committee. So we pushed all of this through. Go back to your
schools and see if anyone is interested in these faculty offices. Passed
handily.
I
moved that we accept recommended dates. Readily approved.
Etc.
People were agreeable.
That
was about it.